Peer review at NIH: a conversation with CSR director Toni Scarpa.

نویسنده

  • Toni Scarpa
چکیده

65 The stated objective of NIH’s efforts to enhance peer review is to “Fund the best science, by the best scientists, with the least amount of administrative burden.” In 2007 NIH began a formal review of its peer review system. This led to the development of a number of new policies and procedures, including the introduction in January 2010 of a shortened and restructured grant application. The APS Public Affairs Committee asked Center for Scientific Review Director Toni Scarpa to provide the readers of The Physiologist with his insight into several key aspects of these peer review changes.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

American Idol and NIH Grant Review

Peer review is an essential part of identifying scientific projects worthy of NIH funding. An Analysis article in the June 2, 2006 issue of Cell (Bonetta, 2006) highlighted the fact that six years after the reorganization of the NIH integrated review groups, further streamlining of NIH grant peer review is still needed. The NIH is well aware of the problems related to the peer review process, a...

متن کامل

Characterization of the Peer Review Network at the Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health

The National Institutes of Health (NIH) is the largest source of funding for biomedical research in the world. This funding is largely effected through a competitive grants process. Each year the Center for Scientific Review (CSR) at NIH manages the evaluation, by peer review, of more than 55,000 grant applications. A relevant management question is how this scientific evaluation system, suppor...

متن کامل

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review

The Working Group on Peer Review of the Advisory Committee to the Director of NIH has recommended that at least 4 reviewers should be used to assess each grant application. A sample size analysis of the number of reviewers needed to evaluate grant applications reveals that a substantially larger number of evaluators are required to provide the level of precision that is currently mandated. NIH ...

متن کامل

Peering into review

Funds awarded after peer review of grant applications by committees established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) directly affects the careers of many biomedical scientists. The scientific tastes and judgments of peer review committees also shape fields by favoring specific questions and approaches to particular scientific opportunities that the committees favor. Such a process natural...

متن کامل

Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores

The predictive validity of peer review at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has not yet been demonstrated empirically. It might be assumed that the most efficient and expedient test of the predictive validity of NIH peer review would be an examination of the correlation between percentile scores from peer review and bibliometric indices of the publications produced from funded projects. T...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The Physiologist

دوره 53 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2010